The most recent report has shown that the charge for the ten year development and day-to-day running of the system will be 4.785 billion, while the cost for foreign nationals will be 326 million.
The card itself will initially cost applications 30, but the Home Office has stated that cost could rise from 2012 the year the programme really kicks off for most citizens.
At the moment, foreign nationals will also be expected to cover the cost of travelling to one of just seven enrolment centres. At the moment, just Croydon is open for business, but is set to be followed by Cardiff, Glasgow, Northern Ireland, Sheffield, Solihull and Liverpool. By the time the 2012 rollout kicks off, the government is hoping citizens won't have to make such journeys, as they'll be able to go to their local post office or photo shop, for example, to have their biometric data taken.
The system has been compared to the passport photo market you need a photo to apply, but you don't need to go to a government office to have it taken, as many shops are authorised to take them. Jacqui Smith said such a system could work for collecting biometrics such as fingerprints, and said such a 'biometric enrolment market' could be worth 200 million by 2012.
"We want these services to be provided by the market, giving people a competitive choice that ensures convenience and cost-effectiveness," she said earlier this month.What that means for ID card applicants is that the 30-and-likely-rising cost does not include the cost of a photograph or your fingerprints.
As noted previously, the card must also be replaced every ten years, at your own cost. While cards do not need to be replaced for each and every address change, they must be replaced following name changes such as after marriage or gender changes. A planned information economy
Cost and privacy aren't the biggest complaints, according to NO2ID's Guy Herbert. "The most fundamental one is that it profoundly alters the relationship between citizen and the state," he told IT PRO. "The Home Office's new model is to put itself as man in the middle for every interaction you have."
"Nobody is allowed to trust anyone else, but are required to trust the Home Office absolutely."
Indeed, in order to access the registry to check the validity of an ID card, both private and public sector organisations must be accredited to ensure they're using the information in a responsible way and have the technology to keep the data safe.
The Home Office, obviously, can't accredit itself, so we're left in the position where we simply have to trust that the data is being held in a safe way or hope the information commissioner's new powers to spot-check can be used on the Home Office itself and the new national identity commissioner gets even stronger powers.
Herbert said this is driven by the government's believe that if it can only collect enough information, it can become more efficient. "Big government's a bit like a planned economy," he suggested. "If only you can get enough information, everything can be made better."
