Germany calls for child abuse sites to be deleted
In a week where the EU revealed its plan to block websites displaying images of child sex abuse, Germany's Justice Minister says they should simply be removed.
Germany has come out in opposition to a European Union plan to block internet sites containing images of child sex abuse, saying such sites should be completely deleted rather than just blocked.
The EU commission plan announced earlier this week would see member states developing their own systems to block access to any sites found to feature pornographic photos or images of children.
However, Germany's Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger said such punishment wasn't strong enough.
Speaking to the Hamburger Abendblatt newspaper, Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger argued that blocking "is not an effective weapon in the fight against child pornography and also leads to a loss of trust among internet users".
"I expect a broad debate ... in which I will push the position 'delete, not block'," the minister added.
Indeed, the position has already found support in Germany from both the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) and the environmentalist Green Party.
"Internet blocking is technically ineffective and doesn't work," SPD deputy party leader Olaf Scholz said this week, while Green Party internet expert Konstantin von Notz said: "Perpetrators can get around blocks within seconds."
Get the ITPro. daily newsletter
Receive our latest news, industry updates, featured resources and more. Sign up today to receive our FREE report on AI cyber crime & security - newly updated for 2024.
The current EU plan, which requires approval of member states and the European Parliament, was announced in Brussels on Monday by Cecilia Malmstrom, the EU home affairs commissioner.
"Child pornography is a horrible crime. It is not an expression of freedom of speech," she told reporters, adding that systems already in place in Scandinavian countries, Italy and the UK "stop thousands of requests each day".
The UK Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) says both plans have merit. "We are clear about what blocking can do," a spokeswoman told the BBC. "It can stop inadvertent access."
But, she added that, as a "notice and take down" agency, the IWF has the power to remove content if it is hosted in Britain.
"Commercial content moves around a lot," she said. "A mixture of blocking and removal is a good tactic because it's so dynamic."
Germany's opposition to blocking websites is already well established. In November, president Horst Khler refused to sign a law handed down from predecessor Angela Merkel blocking online child pornography, saying it would block access to other innocent sites and would therefore breach Germany's constitution.
However, members of Merkel's Christian Democrats (CDU) and child protection groups in Germany support Malmstrom's plans. "Things that are forbidden offline should also be prevented online," said CDU member Wolfgang Bosbach, the chairman of the German parliament's domestic affairs committee.