LimeWire found guilty of inducing copyright theft
Peer-to-peer service LimeWire has lost a court battle with music industry trade body RIAA over inducing copyright theft.


File sharing organisation LimeWire has lost a court battle with the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the trade body for big-name music labels.
The peer-to-peer service and its operators were judged to be liable for inducement of widespread copyright theft and to have engaged in unfair competition.
According to court records seen by CNET, LimeWire founder Mark Gorton was also found guilty of the same charges.
"The court's decision is an important milestone in the creative community's fight to reclaim the internet as a platform for legitimate commerce. By finding LimeWire's chief executive personally liable, in addition to his company, the court has sent a clear signal to those who think they can devise and profit from a piracy scheme that will escape accountability," said Mitch Bainwol, chairman and chief executive of the RIAA, in a statement.
He added: "This definitive ruling is an extraordinary victory for the entire creative community. The court made clear that LimeWire was liable for inducing widespread copyright theft."
LimeWire sent IT PRO a statement from its chief executive George Searle, which read: "LimeWire strongly opposes the court's recent decision. LimeWire remains committed to developing innovative products and services for the end-user and to working with the entire music industry, including the major labels, to achieve this mission."
Last month, Bainwol praised the passing of the Digital Economy Act, saying the UK Government had recognised that ISPs have a big part to play in protecting creators and maintaining the web "as an engine of economic growth and a platform for innovative business models".
Get the ITPro daily newsletter
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
But the Act could be changed or repealed after the recent change in government.
Tom Brewster is currently an associate editor at Forbes and an award-winning journalist who covers cyber security, surveillance, and privacy. Starting his career at ITPro as a staff writer and working up to a senior staff writer role, Tom has been covering the tech industry for more than ten years and is considered one of the leading journalists in his specialism.
He is a proud alum of the University of Sheffield where he secured an undergraduate degree in English Literature before undertaking a certification from General Assembly in web development.
-
CISA issues warning in wake of Oracle cloud credentials leak
News The security agency has published guidance for enterprises at risk
By Ross Kelly
-
Reports: White House mulling DeepSeek ban amid investigation
News Nvidia is caught up in US-China AI battle, but Huang still visits DeepSeek in Beijing
By Nicole Kobie
-
Truss seeks last-ditch SoftBank meeting over Arm IPO
News Gov said to want a dual New York-London listing, at the very least
By Bobby Hellard
-
Pivotal believes IPO will net $592 million
News Dell's cloudy subsidiary details IPO plans in filing
By Clare Hopping
-
Slump raises questions over tech IPO valuations
News Shares in major tech firms dip, but are more losses to come?
By Zach Marzouk
-
Spotify 'might ditch an IPO in favour of direct listing'
News Report - move would see the company bypass institutional investors
By Adam Shepherd
-
CLA CIO Adam Sewell on selecting Microsoft Azure for ‘contractual reasons’
In-depth Cloud has brought issues with contracts, terminology and skills, says Sewell
By Sooraj Shah
-
Snap IPO value hits $30 billion at close of market
News Shares jump 44% as investors get behind stock market debut
By Eleanore Ramsey
-
European copyright law: how it affects you
In-depth The EU is looking to harmonise copyright law, and Google isn’t happy. But should you be?
By Web User
-
Former employee accuses Snapchat of 'misrepresenting growth'
News The whistleblower is now suing Snapchat for intentionally "seeking to destroy his career and reputation"
By Dale Walker