James Lyne, Sophos security expert, said the introduction of a tax could help "raise the bar" so software developers would be compelled to improve security in their products.
However, any tax project would need to be dealt with carefully to avoid damaging new product development," Lyne told IT PRO.
"Such an initiative had to be managed carefully however, many brilliant technology platforms generating business value start of life as underdeveloped, under resourced applications," the young security expert said.
"Stifling innovation has to be considered too."
Lyne agreed with Rice that there was no such thing as "perfect software."
So, whilst the initiative could not eliminate the issue, it could at least improve the situation.
"This tax is actually more in the category of regulation, trying to make sure companies make appropriate investment to manage the risk (presumably commensurate with resources)," Lyne added.
"Regulation can be effective but needs to be handled carefully to avoid adverse effects."
He said it was nevertheless positive that Apple was "standing up and wanting to build transparency and drive investment."
Outside of companies, secure development practices should be instilled in education as well, Lyne said. He claimed many academic bodies were not doing enough to cover this topic.
It seems a vulnerability tax is an interesting concept one that could really shake things up. Yet the idea clearly needs some more thought if it is to ever be implemented.
