Companies using automatic dialling equipment and subjecting customers to numerous silent calls could face significant fines, according to a new ruling from Ofcom.
As of 1 February 2011, new regulations will come into force which, if broken, could lead to fines of up to 2 million for corporations.
The major new rule for call centres will be not to use answer machine detecting equipment more than once a day if an answer machine is detected on the first call. Ofcom claimed this would help the worst affected customers who currently received multiple calls over a 24 hour period.
It also ruled companies should not contact a customer again within 72 hours of a silent call without the guarantee of an operator being live and they should ensure the abandoned call rate was no higher than three per cent of its live call figures.
Ofcom has already fined nine companies for silent calling but the maximum penalty was 50,000 once given to BarclayCard.
However, last September the regulator got the nod from Parliament to ramp up the top fine to 2 million.
The regulator plans to continue monitoring complaints around these type of calls and hopes the regulations and new fine limit will encourage companies to drop the practice.
"Silent and abandoned calls can cause significant consumer harm," said Ed Richards, chief executive (CEO) of Ofcom. "Ofcom has given sufficient warnings to companies about silent calls and is ready to take appropriate action against those companies who continue to break the rules."
-
Cleo attack victim list grows as Hertz confirms customer data stolenNews Hertz has confirmed it suffered a data breach as a result of the Cleo zero-day vulnerability in late 2024, with the car rental giant warning that customer data was stolen.
-
Lateral moves in tech: Why leaders should support employee mobilityIn-depth Encouraging staff to switch roles can have long-term benefits for skills in the tech sector
-
New Ofcom guidelines show it’s getting tougher on big techNews New Ofcom guidance outlining its plans for the Online Safety Act show the regulator is toughening up on big tech.
-
‘Europe could do it, but it's chosen not to do it’: Eric Schmidt thinks EU regulation will stifle AI innovation – but Britain has a huge opportunityNews Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes EU AI regulation is hampering innovation in the region and placing enterprises at a disadvantage.
-
A big enforcement deadline for the EU AI Act just passed – here's what you need to knowNews The first set of compliance deadlines for the EU AI Act passed on the 2nd of February, and enterprises are urged to ramp up preparations for future deadlines.
-
UK financial services firms are scrambling to comply with DORA regulations
News Lack of prioritization and tight implementation schedules mean many aren’t compliant
-
Ofcom’s draft guidelines on illegal online content set stringent rules for big techNews The codes of practice gives an insight into what the Online Safety Act will mean in practice
-
Bletchley Declaration draws cautious approvalNews AI safety agreement garners international support, but some believe it needs more specificity
-
Is the UK falling behind the EU on AI regulation?News The UK could be playing catch-up with its innovation-led approach
-
Big tech firms face 10% turnover fines under new competition lawNews The Digital Markets Unit will finally receive statutory power to pursue the largest firms
