It’s a dog-eat-dog world in the productivity software space and Meta is the latest casualty.
On 14 May, the tech giant confirmed that its Workplace from Meta collaboration suite, formerly known as Facebook at Work, will be scrapped as part of a protracted winding down process. Meta will push its current users onto Zoom’s Workvivo platform, which it described as its “only preferred migration partner”.
Customers will still be able to use the platform until September 2025, according to Micah Collins, Meta’s senior director of product management, after which it will become available only to read or download existing data. The final nail in the coffin will come in 2026.
Meta framed Workplace as a competitor to other major productivity suites available on the market, including Teams. And it made a good fight of it over the years.
At its height in 2021 the platform boasted seven million paid users, per Meta’s own stats, including household names like AstraZeneca, Spotify, and Nestle.
But while Meta has grown accustomed to flexing its muscles in other spheres, it never stood much of a chance in the utterly saturated productivity software market. Slack, Google Workspace, Teams, Zoom; it’s a cacophony of ‘market leading’ platforms, all of which offer roughly the same tools and features.
The advent of generative AI has only heightened competition in the space, with each platform releasing its own spin on AI copilots.
Reaching the seven million user mark was quite a feat, in fairness to the tech giant. But compared to competitors in the space, it was a minnow.
Take Google Workspace, for example. Three billion users globally, per Google, and as of March 2023 a total of nine million paying organizations. This number has no doubt since grown.
Elsewhere, Microsoft 365 boasts over 300 million users and Slack, the plucky, vocal underdog, commands a user base of some 38 million, according to stats from DemandSage.
Aside from being crowded, this marketplace is intensely competitive – or uncompetitive, depending on which camp you’re in. Microsoft has been repeatedly scalded for anticompetitive practices and flexing its muscles in the space, with Slack a vocal opponent in this regard.
This has drawn the attention of regulators on both sides of the Atlantic, with EU lawmakers taking a particular interest in its practices. Just this week, Politico reported that regulators are set to target the tech giant with new antitrust charges amid claims that unbundling Teams from Microsoft 365 “did not go far enough” to create a fairer industry landscape.
Workplace’s demise is by no means the fault of Microsoft, but recent events in this market highlight an unforgiving reality. It’s not the only casualty, either. In August last year, Verizon announced plans to shut down its own flagship collaboration platform, BlueJeans, citing a “changing market landscape” that had made things simply untenable.
Verizon, like Meta, had invested heavily in the platform over the course of a decade and yet still couldn’t stop the rot.
Workplace is a victim of Meta’s changing focus
Over the last several years, Meta has swiveled on a sixpence more than once, each time changing its entire focus as a company. Remember the metaverse, the whole reason we’re referring to Meta as ‘Meta’? That’s been left to simmer slightly since the advent of generative AI.
Meta’s scrapping of Workplace highlights this ever-evolving focus at the tech giant. In a statement to the press, a spokesperson said the firm is discontinuing the platform so it can “focus on building AI and metaverse technologies that we believe will fundamentally reshape the way we work”.
Mark Zuckerberg certainly is all in on AI right now and any potential dead weight, including metaverse plans and maintaining a collaboration software suite, have been cast aside in pursuit of becoming a dominant player in this lucrative space.
Call me cynical, but even the “preferred migration partner” chosen by Meta highlights this. Sending users to Workvivo makes sense given that the tech giant is diving headlong into an AI battle with Microsoft and Google.
Zoom is, in geopolitical terms, somewhat of a safe, ‘Swiss’ option here. Why send users to prospective competitors, regardless of how small that user base is?
The only real winners in this situation will be those who lap up what users Workplace still retained. Shiny new big brand clients to add alongside all the rest on promotional materials for Google or Microsoft.
