Facebook has been hit by two major antitrust lawsuits which claim the social network squashed competition by acquiring smaller companies like Instagram and WhatsApp.
The suits were filed on Wednesday by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and 48 state attorneys general, and are seen as the first move to break the digital giant up. Both suits are seeking remedies for the alleged anticompetitive conduct that could result in requiring Facebook to divest the two services.
Facebook responded with a strongly worded blog post suggesting that no US antitrust enforcer has ever brought up a case like this "for good reason". The company also pointed out that the FTC "correctly" allowed deals for Instagram and WhatsApp to move forward because "they did not threaten competition".
The $1 billion acquisition of Instagram in 2011 is of particular concern to the FTC as it claims Facebook used its power and reach to stifle the growth of a competing service.
"For nearly a decade, Facebook has used its dominance and monopoly power to crush smaller rivals and snuff out competition," New York Attorney General Letitia James said. "Facebook used vast amounts of money to acquire potential rivals before they could threaten the company's dominance."
Facebook pointed out that the FTC stood by for years while it poured billions of dollars into both Instagram and WhatsApp and that it has "seemingly no regard for settled law or the consequences to innovation and investment".
"The FTC conducted an in-depth 'Second Request' of the Instagram transaction in 2012 before voting unanimously to clear it," Jennifer Newstead, Facebook's VP and general counsel wrote in a blog post.
"The European Commission reviewed the WhatsApp transaction in 2014 and found no risk of harm to competition in any potential market. Regulators correctly allowed these deals to move forward because they did not threaten competition.
"Now, many years later, with seemingly no regard for settled law or the consequences to innovation and investment, the agency is saying it got it wrong and wants a do-over. In addition to being revisionist history, this is simply not how the antitrust laws are supposed to work."
-
Bigger salaries, more burnout: Is the CISO role in crisis?In-depth CISOs are more stressed than ever before – but why is this and what can be done?
-
Cheap cyber crime kits can be bought on the dark web for less than $25News Research from NordVPN shows phishing kits are now widely available on the dark web and via messaging apps like Telegram, and are often selling for less than $25.
-
How to empower employees to accelerate emissions reductionin depth With ICT accounting for as much as 3% of global carbon emissions, the same as aviation, the industry needs to increase emissions reduction
-
Worldwide IT spending to grow 4.3% in 2023, with no significant AI impactNews Spending patterns have changed as companies take an inward focus
-
Report: Female tech workers disproportionately affected by industry layoffsNews Layoffs continue to strike companies throughout the tech industry, with data showing females in both the UK and US are bearing the brunt of them more so than males
-
How can small businesses cope with inflation?Tutorial With high inflation increasing the cost of doing business, how can small businesses weather the storm?
-
How to deal with inflation while undergoing digital transformationIn-depth How can organizations stave off inflation while attempting to grow by digitally transforming their businesses?
-
How businesses can use technology to fight inflation
TUTORIAL While technology can’t provide all the answers to fight rising inflation, it can help ease the pain on businesses in the long term
-
Embattled WANdisco to cut 30% of workforce amid fraud scandalNews The layoffs follow the shock resignation of the company’s CEO and CFO in early April
-
Some Tech Nation programs could continue after Founders Forum acquisitionNews The acquisition brings to a close a months-long saga over what the future holds for Tech Nation initiatives
