AWS and Citrix protest proposed VMware deal with US Defense
The proposed agreement would see VMware be department’s single cloud provider

Amazon Web Services, Citrix and Nutanix have launched a protest against the US Department of Defense’s (DoD) proposed $1.6 billion contract with VMware.
The three firms are opposing the possibility that the virtualisation company will win a five-year enterprise licensing agreement to deliver software and support to DoD branch Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA).
DISA is already a big VMware user, with two million licenses in the Army, Navy, Air Force and DISA itself.
But it wants to consolidate support for those licenses into a single contract instead of paying the admin costs created by having lots of separate transactions for its suite of VMware products.
In a redacted document, the department revealed it’s paid admin costs for 9,270 separate transactions over the past five years to procure VMware kit.
The trio of firms complaining about the move have filed bid protests with the Government Accountability Office, saying the agreement would stifle competition, according to Nextgov.
However, while DISA says VMware is the only vendor qualified to provide support for its own products, VMware is pushing cloud services into its proposed enterprise licensing agreement, too.
Get the ITPro daily newsletter
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
That could make it DISA’s single cloud provider.
Nextgov said DISA has two options – either to push forward with its plans and risk the accountability office intervening, or adjusting the proposed agreement to quell the protests of the other cloud and virtualisation vendors.
-
The Race Is On for Higher Ed to Adapt: Equity in Hyflex Learning
By ITPro
-
Google faces 'first of its kind' class action for search ads overcharging in UK
News Google faces a "first of its kind" £5 billion lawsuit in the UK over accusations it has a monopoly in digital advertising that allows it to overcharge customers.
By Nicole Kobie