Information Strategy document - how the government missed a trick

Houses of parliament

When the government published its consultation on how to support and nurture the Information Economy in February 2013, it seemed like a promising moment to be in cloud computing.

The consultation document outlined ambitious ideas for promoting growth in five sectors: cloud computing, big data, e-commerce, internet of things and smart cities.

Indeed, in its summary of responses published three months later, cloud computing was highlighted as ‘the most important of the five, because effort spent in this area would drive the other areas, facilitate access to data, reduce costs and improve efficiency.’

From this, it would be reasonable to assume that actions coming out of the final strategy document would significantly boost the cloud sector. So it's a surprise that in the 57-page final Information Economy Strategy (IES), there is no section on cloud computing,

What's happened here? Was all the talk so much hot air? Yes and no. It is certainly odd, given how much the government made of cloud in its call for views and evidence, and in the summary of that evidence, that there is no specific coverage of cloud issues in the IES.

Readers of the document could also be forgiven for being disappointed at the number of ‘actions’ in the strategy which involve further discussion, setting up of committees and future strategies to be published. For example, it is excellent that the government is setting up an Information Economy Council to drive actions coming out of the Strategy – but that’s no substitute for immediate action on skills, security or tax breaks.

Similarly, lots of the ‘actions’ point towards efforts which are already underway. However, careful examination of the IES does give some reasons to be cheerful.

The summary of responses noted, when it was published in May, that the main barriers to growth in the cloud sector were cyber threats, both real and perceived, poor mobile and fixed infrastructure and inadequate data protection.

To varying degrees, these are addressed in the IES, and should the government make genuine headway in these areas it will certainly help the cloud sector grow. A considerable amount of the document is spent on cyber security, with reminders of research funding already available, user training schemes and of course the huge amount of work done out of public sight to keep the UK’s online infrastructure secure.

There wasn’t anything in this document that a reader of the separate Cyber Security Strategy wouldn’t already know about, but it served as a good reminder of existing work. Similarly, there were reminders in the Strategy of the government’s existing work to promote broadband infrastructure and of its 5G research funding at the University of Surrey.

But the glaring omission is any mention of changing organisational cultures to encourage more employees, both in the private and public sector, to adopt online services – particularly those who have a significant influence over spending.

For example, the government’s work on the G-Cloud iterations is laudable and should save it significant money in the long run as well as being of benefit to the SMEs on the framework. The IES contains important passages on how to improve digital skills in the UK, which should encourage citizens to do more online, but nowhere in the document does it suggest how it is going to change cultures, especially in Whitehall, to ensure that public sector workers take ‘Cloud First’ to heart rather than relying on their desktops.

It seems odd that, shortly after the Government COO films how long his computer takes to start up and places it on YouTube, that there is no mention of how to change the way public sector workers think about the commissioning and use of IT services, particularly cloud-based ones. To give the government some credit, this is something that is being pushed by the Cabinet Office – but mention of it should have been made here.

Overall the IES certainly isn’t bad news for the cloud sector, but what it seemed to promise in its initial consultation hasn’t been matched by the reality. It's a collection of reminders of action already being taken, promises to set up committees and of action further down the line.

These changes, particularly changes to organisational culture and mindset, however don’t take place overnight. Despite the concerns, there is reason to be cautiously optimistic. The government is clearly supportive of the cloud sector, and wants to encourage growth here – but of course there is always more work to be done.

Latest in Public Cloud
A mysterious light trail descending a mountain slope
The role of the MSP in lighting the path to a revised cloud strategy for the mid-market
Three clouds supported by metal framework structure
Overcoming DevOps challenges in multi-cloud environments
Public Cloud concept image showing digitized cloud image looming over map of Europe with multiple separate cloud images surrounding it.
Public cloud investment surged nearly 20% in 2023 – and analysts predict global spending will reach $1.6 trillion by 2028
The words ‘Ransomware revenants and ‘open source’ AI ’ overlaid on a lightly-blurred, abstract painting. Decorative: the words ‘Ransomware revenants ’ and ''open source AI'' are in yellow, while other words are in white. The ITPro podcast logo is in the bottom right corner.
April rundown: Ransomware revenants and ‘open source’ AI
The AWS logo, on a curtain-like wall at AWS re:Invent 2023 at the Venetian Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. Decorative: The logo (the letters 'AWS' with a curved arrow beneath) is in white, and the whole photo is lit with purple lighting.
Competitor mudslinging at re:Invent shows AWS is sweating
A photo of the AWS logo (the letters "AWS" with a curved arrow beneath moving from left to right) in white on a black wall, and lit by a spotlight. Closer to the camera and out of focus, a conference crowd is sat.
AWS is all in on generative AI, and re:Invent offers a stage to blow competition out the water
Latest in Feature
A photo of UNSW's Sunswift 7 car pictured in front of Uluru in Australia's Northern Territory.
How UNSW’s Sunswift Racing and Ericsson achieved cross-country connectivity in Australia’s outback
Matt Clifford speaking at Treasury Connect conference in 2023
Who is Matt Clifford?
Open source vulnerabilities concept image showing HTML code on a computer screen.
Open source risks threaten all business users – it’s clear we must get a better understanding of open source software
An abstract CGI image of a large green cuboid being broken in half with yellow, orange, and red cubes to represent ransomware resilience and data encryption.
Building ransomware resilience to avoid paying out
The words "How effective are AI agents?" set against a dark blue background bearing the silhouettes of flowchart rectangles and diamonds to represent the computation and decisions made by AI agents. The words "AI agents" are yellow, while the others are white. The ITPro Podcast logo is in the bottom right-hand corner.
How effective are AI agents?
An illustration showing a mouth with speech bubbles and question marks and a stylized robot alien representing an AI assistant chirping away with symbols and ticks, to represent user annoyance with AI assistants.
On-device AI assistants are meant to be helpful – why do I find them so annoying?