Uber CISO: There was no justification for hiding data breach
Senators slam taxi firm for cover-up of hack affecting 57 million people
Uber's CISO yesterday admitted that there was "no justification" for covering up a huge data breach affecting millions of customers and drivers.
The breach, which was first reported in November last year, exposed the personal information of 57 million users, including 2.7 million in the UK, as well as the license numbers of roughly 600,000 drivers.
Uber's John Flynn told US lawmakers at a Senate hearing yesterday that the company made an error in not disclosing the intrusion to the authorities and to its customers, saying: "We made a misstep in not reporting to consumers, and I think we made a misstep in not reporting to law enforcement."
Rather than report the breach, Uber paid one of the two hackers responsible $100,000 to keep the breach under wraps and to not leak the stolen data.
Senators also noted that while Uber was covering this breach up, it was in the midst of negotiations with the Federal Trade Commission over a settlement for an earlier data breach.
The money was delivered through a bug bounty programme - a framework usually used to reward ethical hackers for reporting flaws to companies rather than exploiting them. Flynn acknowledged in his testimony that this use of the bug bounty programme was 'inappropriate'.
"We recognise that the bug bounty programme is not an appropriate vehicle for dealing with intruders who seek to extort funds from the company," he said. "The approach that these intruders took was separate and distinct from those of the researchers in the security community for whom bug bounty programs are designed."
Get the ITPro. daily newsletter
Receive our latest news, industry updates, featured resources and more. Sign up today to receive our FREE report on AI cyber crime & security - newly updated for 2024.
Legislators slammed Uber over its conduct, calling its actions "morally wrong and legally reprehensible".
"There ought to be no question here that Uber's payment of this blackmail without notifying consumers who were greatly at risk was morally wrong and legally reprehensible and violated not only the law but the norm of what should be expected," said Democratic senator Richard Blumenthal.
"The fact that the company took approximately a year to notify impacted users raises red flags within this committee as to what systemic issues prevented such time-sensitive information from being made available to those left vulnerable," added Republican and Senate panel chairman senator Jerry Moran.
Adam Shepherd has been a technology journalist since 2015, covering everything from cloud storage and security, to smartphones and servers. Over the course of his career, he’s seen the spread of 5G, the growing ubiquity of wireless devices, and the start of the connected revolution. He’s also been to more trade shows and technology conferences than he cares to count.
Adam is an avid follower of the latest hardware innovations, and he is never happier than when tinkering with complex network configurations, or exploring a new Linux distro. He was also previously a co-host on the ITPro Podcast, where he was often found ranting about his love of strange gadgets, his disdain for Windows Mobile, and everything in between.
You can find Adam tweeting about enterprise technology (or more often bad jokes) @AdamShepherUK.