CEOs' compensation - including salary, bonuses and stock options - should be linked to their companies' cyber security performance, according to a new report from the Culture, Media and Sport committee.
The report comes after an inquiry into cyber security and data breaches, which was initiated following last year's massive TalkTalk hack.
As part of the committee's recommendations, it suggested a laundry list of requirements for companies to minimise and respond to data breaches.
This included general company-wide policies, such as reporting cyber security and data protection strategies to the Information Comissioner's Office (ICO), as well as including cyber security in their annual bottom-line reporting alongside social and environmental reporting.
However, the recommendations also included measures designed to make CEOs and IT decision makers more accountable in the wake of data breaches, as well as recommending that those who trade in stolen personal data should be sentenced to up to two years in jail.
The report advised that while CEOs should lead crisis response in the wake of a breach, full responsibility a breach should reside with whoever handles it day-to-day, who can be "fully sanctioned" if the company has not adequately protected itself.
It also recommended that CEOs' financial earnings be directly linked to their companies' security, "to ensure this issue receives sufficient CEO attention".
"Today's report by the Culture, Media and Sport Committee highlights the importance of good cyber-security practices for businesses of all sizes that have an online presence or service," said Talal Rajab, techUK's head of cyber and national security.
"To maintain user confidence in digital services, and the growth of the UK's digital economy, companies must have appropriate cyber-security policies and processes in place."
In addition to penalties for not preventing breaches, the report also advocated that the ICO should institute a series of escalating fines for companies that fail to disclose data breaches.
It was also noted that the ICO's current maximum fine of 500,000 "may not be a significant deterrent" for larger organisations. However, this is set to change anyway once the European General Data Protection Regulation comes into force in 2018.
-
Cleo attack victim list grows as Hertz confirms customer data stolenNews Hertz has confirmed it suffered a data breach as a result of the Cleo zero-day vulnerability in late 2024, with the car rental giant warning that customer data was stolen.
-
Lateral moves in tech: Why leaders should support employee mobilityIn-depth Encouraging staff to switch roles can have long-term benefits for skills in the tech sector
-
AI recruitment tools are still a privacy nightmare – here's how the ICO plans to crack down on misuseNews The ICO has issued guidance for recruiters and AI developers after finding that many are mishandling data
-
“You must do better”: Information Commissioner John Edwards calls on firms to beef up support for data breach victimsNews Companies need to treat victims with swift, practical action, according to the ICO
-
LinkedIn backtracks on AI training rules after user backlashNews UK-based LinkedIn users will now get the same protections as those elsewhere in Europe
-
UK's data protection watchdog deepens cooperation with National Crime AgencyNews The two bodies want to improve the support given to organizations experiencing cyber attacks and ransomware recovery
-
ICO slams Electoral Commission over security failuresNews The Electoral Commission has been reprimanded for poor security practices, including a failure to install security updates and weak password policies
-
Disgruntled ex-employees are using ‘weaponized’ data subject access requests to pester firmsNews Some disgruntled staff are using DSARs as a means to pressure former employers into a financial settlement
-
ICO reprimands Coventry school over repeated data protection failuresNews The ICO said the academy trust failed to follow previous guidance, which caused a serious data breach
-
ICO dishes out fine to HelloFresh for marketing spam campaignNews HelloFresh failed to offer proper opt-outs, the ICO said, and customers weren’t warned their data would be used for months after they cancelled
