Facebook may have paid $4.9 billion more than it had to in a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over allegations of privacy mishandling.
According to a Delaware court ruling yesterday, Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights of the Court of Chancery public released information from papers prepared by a law firm advising Facebook’s board of directors as they debated a proposed $5 billion settlement with the FTC. According to reports, the agreement also protected CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
Slights cited the paper in a ruling that directed Facebook to turn over internal documents to Rhode Island’s public employee pension fund. The fund is questioning how the FTC came to an agreement with Facebook over personal data misuse.
The fund is investigating whether Facebook executives agreed to pay billions more as part of a settlement over Cambridge Analytica’s misuse of personal data to shield Zuckerberg from personal liability in the case. Delaware law allows investors access to internal files if they have legitimate questions over directors’ mismanagement.
Cambridge Analytica harvested millions of Facebook users’ personal data and helped Donald Trump win his presidential bid in 2016. The data was also used to win a referendum that saw the UK leave the EU.
RELATED RESOURCE
Building a modern information governance strategy
How to rethink your approach to develop a more modern information governance strategy
“The documents already produced provide no insight into why Facebook would pay more than its (apparently) maximum exposure to settle a claim,” said Slights in the ruling reported by Reuters. He added that shareholders were “right to question whether internal communications among Facebook fiduciaries might shed light on the Board’s thinking in this regard.”
According to the Gibson Dunn paper, slights said Facebook faced a maximum penalty of about $104 million. The FTC deal with Facebook in July 2019 was thought to resolve issues around how Facebook handled user privacy. At the time, the company admitted no wrongdoing.
According to Reuters, Slights hasn’t ordered Facebook to turn over documents it claims are protected by attorney-client privilege. Slights’ reasoning was in part because shareholders could gain insights from non-privileged electronic communications he ordered Facebook to disclose.
The FTC and Facebook are yet to make a response to these reports.
The ruling comes as the FTC probes how major tech companies’ collect and manage user information, including minors’ data.
-
The UK government wants quantum technology out of the lab and in the hands of enterprisesNews The UK government has unveiled plans to invest £121 million in quantum computing projects in an effort to drive real-world applications and adoption rates.
-
Netgear WBE710 reviewReviews The compact WBE710 delivers great cloud management features and a good turn of Wi-Fi 7 speed – but it does have a premium price tag
-
Latest Meta GDPR fine brings 12-month total to more than €1 billionNews Meta was issued with two hefty GDPR fines for “forcing” users to consent to data processing
-
"Unacceptable" data scraping lands Meta a £228m data protection fineNews The much-awaited decision follows the scraping of half a billion users' data and received unanimous approval from EU regulators
-
Meta notifies around 1 million Facebook users of potential compromise through malicious appsNews The vast majority of apps targeting iOS users appeared to be genuine apps for managing business functions such as advertising and analytics
-
Facebook business accounts hijacked by infostealer malware campaignNews Threat actors are using LinkedIn phishing to seize business, ad accounts for financial gain
-
Meta begins encrypting Facebook URLs, nullifying tracking countermeasures
News The move has made URL stripping impossible but will improve analytics
-
Meta hit with €17 million fine over multiple GDPR breachesNews The social media giant set aside over €1 billion in November to help it cope with potential fines arising from data protection investigations
-
Meta says Apple's iOS privacy changes will cost it $10 billion in 2022News The company's CFO suggests Google "faces a different set of restrictions" because it pays Apple to remain the default iOS search engine
-
Google, Facebook fined €210 million for making it difficult for users to reject cookiesNews Data regulator CNIL gives companies three months to provide a system for refusing cookies that is as easy as single click consent
