Russian hacking group masquerades as Iranian spy network
Hacking technique highlights how difficult it is to attribute blame after a cyber attack


Russian hackers hijacked Iranian cyber espionage infrastructure to attack government and industry organisations in dozens of countries while pretending to be Iranian cyber attackers.
The Turla group, also known as VENOMOUS BEAR, infiltrated the systems of Iranian cyber criminals to launch attacks on Western targets, according to a joint report by the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and National Security Agency (NSA).
Analysis by the two agencies revealed the Russian-linked group acquired a pair of tools associated with Iranian hackers, namely Neuron and Nautilus, as well as the data linked with it.
Turla then tested these tools against victims it had already compromised, before turning its attention towards new victims. Hackers scanned target organisations for backdoors planted by Iranian cyber criminals in order to exploit them and gain a foothold.
"The behaviour of Turla in scanning for backdoor shells indicates that whilst they had a significant amount of insight into the Iranian tools, they did not have full knowledge of where they were deployed," the NCSC said in an advisory.
"While attribution of attacks and proving authorship of tools can be very difficult particularly in the space of incident response on a victim network the weight of evidence demonstrates that Turla had access to Iranian tools and the ability to identify and exploit them to further Turla's own aims."
The volume of cyber attacks emanating from both Russia and Iran have risen substantially in recent months and years, as geopolitical tensions with the US have escalated.
Get the ITPro daily newsletter
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
Microsoft, for example, disclosed data in July suggesting that approximately 10,000 of its customers were targeted by state-sponsored attacks during the 12 months. Further analysis showed these attackers were predominately launched by five groups divided between three nations; Iran, Russia, and North Korea.
Analysis by the NCSC and NSA shows that the Neuron and Nautilus tools, deployed by Turla, were first seen deployed with the Snake rootkit on a range of victims. Followup investigations have shown inconsistencies, however, with these tools also deployed on a large cluster of victims in the Middle East, but not all in conjunction with the Snake implant.
Breaking this down further, it became clear to investigators that these victims were targeted by cyber criminals using virtual private server (IP) addresses linked with Iranian hackers. Furthermore, Iranian cyber criminals were actually the first to deploy these tools, with Turla piggybacking off them subsequently.
Turla, moreover, accessed and used the command and control (C2) infrastructure of Iranian hacking groups to launch its own attacks. The group also deployed its own implants against the infrastructure used by Iranian groups, using this to further their own access into the global operational infrastructure and to exfiltrate data.

Keumars Afifi-Sabet is a writer and editor that specialises in public sector, cyber security, and cloud computing. He first joined ITPro as a staff writer in April 2018 and eventually became its Features Editor. Although a regular contributor to other tech sites in the past, these days you will find Keumars on LiveScience, where he runs its Technology section.
-
Third time lucky? Microsoft finally begins roll-out of controversial Recall feature
News The Windows Recall feature has been plagued by setbacks and backlash from security professionals
By Emma Woollacott Published
-
The UK government wants quantum technology out of the lab and in the hands of enterprises
News The UK government has unveiled plans to invest £121 million in quantum computing projects in an effort to drive real-world applications and adoption rates.
By Emma Woollacott Published
-
Three ways to evolve your security operations
Whitepaper Why current approaches aren’t working
By ITPro Published
-
Beat cyber criminals at their own game
Whitepaper A guide to winning the vulnerability race and protection your organization
By ITPro Published
-
Quantifying the public vulnerability market: 2022 edition
Whitepaper An analysis of vulnerability disclosures, impact severity, and product analysis
By ITPro Published
-
Same cyberthreat, different story
Whitepaper How security, risk, and technology asset management teams collaborate to easily manage vulnerabilities
By ITPro Published
-
Business value of ServiceNow security operations
Whitepaper Experience transformational gains from automating workflows and data-sharing among IT, security, and risk teams to rapidly remediate threats
By ITPro Published
-
Cybercriminals are resilient. How about you?
Whitepaper Stay ahead of those agile bad actors
By ITPro Published
-
Threat Intelligence: Critical in the fight against cyber attacks, but tough to master
Whitepaper Discover why many claim Threat Intelligence is extremely important in protecting their company and data
By ITPro Published
-
State of ransomware readiness 2022
Whitepaper Reducing the personal and business cost
By ITPro Published