Senior software developers are among the most receptive to AI code generation tools, according to new research.
A study from Fastly shows roughly one-third of senior developers, classed as those with over 10 years of experience, regularly use AI tools to build software. This is nearly two and a half times the rate of junior colleagues, the study noted.
While Fastly said the study highlights the growing appeal of AI-generated code, there are notable downsides – mainly fixing faulty code. Developers across all levels reported issues in this regard, with time savings often being negated by manual remediation.
“Senior developers were also more likely [than juniors] to say they invest time fixing AI-generated code,” the company said in a blog post detailing the research. “Just under 30% of seniors reported editing AI output enough to offset most of the time savings, compared to 17% of juniors.”
Remediating faulty code has emerged as a key hurdle for developers using AI tools in recent months.
Google’s 2024 State of DevOps report noted growing developer concerns about code quality, for example. A similar study from Cloudsmith in June 2025 warned some enterprises were overlooking key security considerations in a bid to drive efficiency.
Analysis from Harness in January this year found the issue had reached such an extent that developers were growing frustrated with the new tools at their disposal.
More than two-thirds (67%) reported spending more time debugging AI-generated code than prior to the introduction of the tools. Around 68%, meanwhile, now spend more time resolving vulnerabilities.
Regardless, Fastly found that senior developers appear more than content with using AI tools, and are confident in their ability to spot potential issues during development.
More than half (59%) of senior devs said AI tools “help them ship faster overall” while 49% of juniors held the same view. Senior staff were also more likely to report “significant speed gains” (26%) compared to less experienced colleagues, (13%).
Experience breeds confidence
According to Fastly, a key factor behind the confidence observed among senior developers is that they’re “simply better equipped to catch and correct AI’s mistakes”.
“They have the experience to recognize when code ‘looks right’ but isn’t,” the company said. “That makes them more confident at using AI tools efficiently, even for high-stakes or business-critical code.”
Meanwhile, junior developers are typically more cautious about relying on AI, or “more likely to avoid using it in production at all”.
“More experienced engineers are not only using AI more aggressively, but are also trusting it more in production environments,” Fastly added.
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
- AI coding tools are finally delivering results for enterprises
- AI coding tools are booming – and developers in this one country are by far the most frequent users
- How AI coding is transforming the IT industry in 2025
-
What does modern security success look like for financial services?Sponsored As financial institutions grapple with evolving cyber threats, intensifying regulations, and the limitations of ageing IT infrastructure, the need for a resilient and forward-thinking security strategy has never been greater
-
Yes, legal AI. But what can you actually do with it? Let’s take a look…Sponsored Legal AI is a knowledge multiplier that can accelerate research, sharpen insights, and organize information, provided legal teams have confidence in its transparent and auditable application
-
UK software developers are still cautious about AI, and for good reasonNews Experts say developers are “right to take their time” with AI coding solutions given they still remain a nascent tool
-
AI-generated code is now the cause of one-in-five breaches – but developers and security leaders alike are convinced the technology will come good eventuallyNews AI coding tools now write 24% of production code globally, but it's risky and causing issues for developers and security practitioners alike.
-
Anthropic’s new Claude Code web portal aims to make AI coding even more accessibleNews Claude Code for web runs entirely in a user’s browser of choice rather than in a command-line interface and can be connected directly to chosen GitHub repositories.
-
The UK’s aging developer workforce needs a ‘steady pipeline’ of talent to meet future demand – but AI’s impact on entry-level jobs and changing skills requirements mean it could be fighting an uphill battleAnalysis With the average age of developers in the UK rising, concerns are growing about the flow of talent into the sector
-
AI coding really isn't living up to expectations – "the savings have been unremarkable" but not for the reason you might thinkNews Companies are focusing too heavily on simple AI coding tasks, and not overhauling wider business processes
-
UK government programmers trialed AI coding assistants from Microsoft, GitHub, and Google – here's what they foundNews Developers participating in a trial of AI coding tools from Google, Microsoft, and GitHub reported big time savings, with 58% saying they now couldn't work without them.
-
Microsoft touts new Copilot features in Excel, but says you shouldn’t use them if you want accurate resultsNews Microsoft has warned against using new AI features in Excel for “tasks with legal, regulatory, or compliance implications” – so when can you use it?
-
Hexaware partners with Replit to take secure 'vibe coding' to the enterpriseNews The new collaboration enables business teams to create secure, production-grade applications without the need for traditional coding skills
