General hesitancy and negative perceptions of generative AI are beginning to dissipate as businesses and employees both come to see the value of the technology, Salesforce and Slack executives have said.
The comments came during a panel discussion at Dreamforce 2023 this week, with Slack CEO Lidiane Jones saying “it’s amazing how much it’s shifted over the last nine months”.
“I think as people - so leaders and employees - have started to try different things, the mystery is starting to shape into what’s really useful.”
Jones added that firms and employees alike are beginning to consider “how they can take part” in the current generative AI wave.
“What I’ve seen in the last few months is that leaders are trying to help their employees understand their own journeys with AI.”
Nathalie Scardino, interim chief people officer at Salesforce, echoed Jones’ comments and highlighted a growing appetite among its own employees based on the benefits of AI.
“I’ve seen a meaningful shift towards ‘how can I be a part of it’,” she said. “And that’s across the board - both leaders and employees. So it’s a really positive thing.”
“The narrative is definitely shifting. In our employee base it’s now ‘how can I work AI’, but ‘how AI can work for me’,” Scardino added. “That’s a turning point.”
When ChatGPT, the first major generative AI tool to reach the wider population’s hands was launched in late 2022, the tool’s capabilities were something many had not seen before.
Conversations around its potential to replace jobs - a fear held by many people for years prior - quickly arose. Other major tech companies racing to develop their own equivalent technology and embed it as widely in their product portfolios as possible, also did nothing to quell those fears that AI was ‘taking over’ at an alarming rate.
Learn about the AI and cyber security landscape, its benefits, and risks.
However, over time the current limitations of generative AI have become more widely understood, and there is a better understanding that in its current state of development, the technology will not be replacing many jobs entirely, at least in the short term.
Software engineering is an industry that has embraced generative AI with open arms in the last few years.
GitHub’s Copilot tool has revolutionized the way in which developers build projects, and professionals understand it’s not a tool that could write an entire website or application through text-based prompts alone. As AI experts have said for some time, generative AI tools are there to augment workers rather than replace them.
Slack itself has outlined its vision for embedding generative AI in its communications platform, including its ambitions to provide users with features such as meeting summaries and writing assistance.
With the value of generative AI being so apparent for businesses, the rapid uptake of the technology is likely to continue.
At present, publishers such as Future PLC, owner of the ITPro brand, have begun rolling out generative AI tools across their websites. For example, Tom’s Hardware has a generative AI-driven chatbot that allows readers to ask questions such as ‘what CPU is right for my PC build?’
Publishing was among the industries that were believed to be most at risk of displacement by the development of AI, but as Jones has said, those fears have started to dissipate as the understanding of the technology’s capabilities has grown.
Despite this, there is still evidence that major businesses are preparing for a widespread replacement of jobs by AI.
In May, BT announced a wave of job cuts that were described as “brutal” in a bid to automate a significant portion of roles at the telecoms giant.
IBM chief executive Arvind Krishna also revealed in the same month that around 7,800 staff in “non-customer-facing roles” could be replaced by AI at the firm in the coming years.
It’s also been claimed that up to 300 million jobs could be lost globally as organizations adopt tools and shed staff in an attempt to maximize profitability.
That’s according to research from Goldman Sachs. An additional finding from its report claimed that roughly 18% of work could become computerized and that workers in ‘advanced economies’ would be hit hardest by AI-linked job losses.
